Received: from tomahawk.grandi.com (tomahawk.grandi.com [38.251.244.5]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with SMTP id QAA05886 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 16:37:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by tomahawk.grandi.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id BAA25895 for lightwave-outgoing; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 01:27:31 -0400
Received: from callnet.com (root@callnet.com [204.249.209.2]) by tomahawk.grandi.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA25862 for <lightwave@tomahawk.grandi.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 01:26:44 -0400
Received: from totoket.callnet.com (ppp4.callnet.com [204.249.209.129]) by callnet.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id PAA24954 for <lightwave@tomahawk.grandi.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 15:50:02 -0400
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 96 15:30:57 PDT
From: John DeNicola <totoket@CALLNET.COM>
Subject: Newtek BBS News: LW 4.0 - 20% Slower
To: lightwave@tomahawk.grandi.com
X-MAILER: Chameleon V0.05, TCP/IP for Windows, NetManage Inc.
Message-ID: <Chameleon.960429153203.totoket@>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-lightwave@tomahawk.grandi.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: The LightWave mailing list <lightwave@tomahawk.grandi.com>
Status: RO
X-Status:
[Message from NewTek Tech Support BBS]
From: CHUCK -To-: MERIGHI
Subj: Re: hiin save problems Area: LightWave Su
On Mon 22-Apr-1996 7:38 , Merighi wrote:
> the last thing: i found lw4.0 slower than 3.5 about 20%.
> in a couple of italian magazines i read they like lw4.0 because is faster
> than old version. are they wrong or is my package bad?
> regards
>
Lightwave 4.0 is slower by about 20%, on rendering speed. We changed
Compilers as part of the effort to go multi-platform, and some of the
structural changes in the program have resulted in an amiga version that
performs slower than previous versions. We are looking at ways to address
this for future versions.
Chuck
NewTek
--- From the LightWave mailing list <lightwave@tomahawk.grandi.com> --------
--- This message posted by: John DeNicola <totoket@callnet.com>